Skip to main content

The Morning Report - 25 Apr 2013

I sat in a class once with a very interesting and entertaining individual who took the participants through a world of medical practices that were no longer proven to work.  In this he discussed medications, techniques, and procedures that had lost favor in the medical community, but some facets of the field would not, or could not let them go. 

I have been in multiple conversations where I was the sole spokesman against certain techniques, but the argument against removing it was because they had seen it work.  One of the first was the argument of the trendelenburg position.  Dr. Trendelenburg was a famous surgeon in his day and created a position that would make it more feasible to conduct abdominal surgery.  Soon people thought the position would help treat those in hypovolemic shock by increasing pressures back to the heart and brain.  This was a large part of the treatment of hypotensive patients until the past decade.  Even the Doctor that created the position said it would work, yet the field still uses it to this day (many have removed, but I saw it this past weekend). 

There are many, many others, but the movement towards evidence based medicine has taken another procedure and placed it square in the crosshairs of those investigating.  That is the process of spinal immobilization.  First, if you are anything like me and somebody simply said we are hurting people, I would be like "yeah right"!!!  I'm here to help and its helping prevent further injury.  But what if I came to you and said were not preventing injury, and we are causing more harm than good, but I also provided evidence.  That is where the field of medicine is right now. 

The National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) presented an abstract at a conference earlier this year on the biomechanics of spinal immobilization.  The results, wait for it!!! We are hurting people, and yet we keep doing it. 

I know that there is a movement to change the way we conduct spinal immobilization, in fact my medical director is looking for options to the way we currently do things, but we must also continue until these changes are made.

I ask you this question though, when does the legal side catch up with medicine.  Now, any good lawyer would be willing to make a case either way, but what if somebody received further injury because they weren't on a spine board.  I think that is what is preventing a lot of people from taking on this bold change in prehospital medicine. 

Look for it, it is on the horizon. 

Take Care and Stay Safe!
The Combomedic

twitter.com/dsblev

Rogue Medic
EMS World


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ELPA 6872 -Educational Technology

Good Morning Everybody. It has been a long time since I have posted on this blog.  The reason I am is a great reason for my Fire and EMS Audience, as well as my academic colleagues. After a very eventful beginning of 2018, my application was selected to join the latest cohort of students obtaining their Doctor of Education.  As part of this program, we are completing a course that is dedicated to technology and implementation into the classroom.  The delivery of this program is through technology based platforms, in that it is an online program. Here are some questions that I have about technology, and online learning. 1)  To mimic some of the classroom interaction and discussion, online educators use the discussion board with each module to foster communication.  For those of you having completed online educational programs, what made the discussion board useful? 2)  Does the set-up of the online course material make a difference in the success o...
8 comments
Read more

He Shall From Time to Time!!!

" He shall from time to time give to Congress information of the State of the Union and recommend to their Consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient." (US Constitution) Now, this isn't going to be a lesson on the US Constitution, but we expect the President of the United States to get up in front of both the House and Senate and provide his viewpoint of where the country is politically.  This speech is written months in advance and the topics are carefully crafted and tested to make sure they have the best impact.  Once the State of the Union is done, the President's staff starts the political spin, and members of Congress start working their way around the country, as does the President, to sell the speech.  We expect this from our nation's leaders, just not the leaders of the emergency services protecting our nation's capital.   The State of the Union is provided annually.  This event is well know and is conducted lik...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Original Sequestration

In the recent months, anybody that has a radio or television has heard the term sequester or sequestration.  If you look-up sequestration online you will find a definition basically stating that an object (of some sort) will be taken back.  In 1985 Congress adjusted the term to become a fiscal definition basically meaning to take money back.  You can get even more fancy with the definition; however, overall something was giveth and something will be taketh away!!! Now, my question to you today is whether you know what this means to you?  Really, you don't?  Well don't worry you are not in the minority in this case.  I think if you were to ask those that govern what the 2013 sequestration actually means and how the population of the United State is going to be affected.  Open up the paper (or online copy) and you will find a different editorial on how the sequestration is going to affect rank and file members of this wonderful country.  One edito...
Post a Comment
Read more