Skip to main content

Its the Morning Report


Ok, so I just referenced the Lion King...don't judge me. It was the last hand drawn animated movie done by Disney, and in my opinion one of the best.
I have been watching several reports come out lately about the deadly crash of an Air Methods helicopter back in 2011. (Video Below)
 
In the report federal investigators are saying that a distracted pilot was the potential cause of this fatal incident. More specifically, the federal investigators are saying that a personal text chain between the pilot and another individual was the potential cause of the pilot not realizing that he was low fuel which resulted in the crash.
Many states have adopted a no texting policy when driving on the roadway, and many more have adopted legislation that states individuals must use headsets just to talk on the phone while driving. Fire and EMS services in many areas have gone well above that and said no cell phone use while driving at all, especially during an emergency vehicles.

In this instance it was stated that the pilot had been carrying on a conversation with another individual, with many of those text communications coming after the flight was initiated. While the primary focus was the amount of fuel, it has been decided that the lack of focus on his primary mission was the primary concern. In the reports it shows that the pilot was engaged in the text exchange and either miscalculated the amount of fuel necessary for the flight, or didn't realize how much he had at the time. It is noted that while there were several text communications during the flight, none of those communications came within the final 10-11 minutes of the flight either.

It is reported that Air Methods, the parent company of the above flight, has now implemented a zero tolerance policy for texting in these situations. My question is, are we singling out texting as the primary reason and eliminating all others, or was that the single cause of the accident. I agree with eliminating texting access during all emergency runs (both air and ground) because of the individual in control of the unit doesn't have their full focus on the roadway.

Over the last several years, we have witness several aeromedical units crashing in various places from Kansas to Alaska and even more far reaching in this country. The alternate to that is these aeromedical individuals are an integral part of the pre-hospital emergency care community. They are taking medicine to the air and delivering patients to critical care facilities much faster than some of their counterparts on the ground.

What are your thoughts?

Take Care and Stay Safe The Combomedic

twitter.com/dsblev




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ELPA 6872 -Educational Technology

Good Morning Everybody. It has been a long time since I have posted on this blog.  The reason I am is a great reason for my Fire and EMS Audience, as well as my academic colleagues. After a very eventful beginning of 2018, my application was selected to join the latest cohort of students obtaining their Doctor of Education.  As part of this program, we are completing a course that is dedicated to technology and implementation into the classroom.  The delivery of this program is through technology based platforms, in that it is an online program. Here are some questions that I have about technology, and online learning. 1)  To mimic some of the classroom interaction and discussion, online educators use the discussion board with each module to foster communication.  For those of you having completed online educational programs, what made the discussion board useful? 2)  Does the set-up of the online course material make a difference in the success o...

The Original Sequestration

In the recent months, anybody that has a radio or television has heard the term sequester or sequestration.  If you look-up sequestration online you will find a definition basically stating that an object (of some sort) will be taken back.  In 1985 Congress adjusted the term to become a fiscal definition basically meaning to take money back.  You can get even more fancy with the definition; however, overall something was giveth and something will be taketh away!!! Now, my question to you today is whether you know what this means to you?  Really, you don't?  Well don't worry you are not in the minority in this case.  I think if you were to ask those that govern what the 2013 sequestration actually means and how the population of the United State is going to be affected.  Open up the paper (or online copy) and you will find a different editorial on how the sequestration is going to affect rank and file members of this wonderful country.  One edito...

Presidential Budget cuts 2.5M from vital grants!

I know that many of you are tired of hearing about the budget and the sequestration, fiscal cliffs and many many other things that are occurring in the federal budget.  Some of you don't care because it isn't currently affecting your department.  This is one budget update that you may want to pay attention to.  In the President's 2013 budget, the SAFER and Assistance to Firefighter grant programs are not being funded to previous years levels.  Now that cut currently sits at 2.5 million out of a total of 335m per program.  However, and this is where I caution you any cuts can be a dangerous sign to the future of this program.   As you know, emergency services (police, fire and ems) serves of America's first line of defense when it comes to dangerous situations.  These are the groups that are running towards the danger while others run out...i've always hated that quote, but it works.  Videos from the tragic events at the World Trade Ce...